Effects of Memorhis, a Poly
Herbal Formulation in the Management memory Dysfunctions
Hanumanthachar Joshi1* and Milind Parle2
1Division of Pharmacognosy, Dept. of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Sarada Vilas College of Pharmacy, Mysore- 570004,
Karnataka, India.
2Division of Pharmacology, Department of Pharm. Sciences, Guru
Jambheshwar University, Hiar-125001, Haryana, India
ABSTRACT:
Cure of cognitive disorders such as amnesia, attention deficit and
Alzheimer’s disease is still a nightmare in the field of medicine. Nootropic agents such as piracetam,
aniracetam and cholinesterase inhibitors like Donepezil are being used to improve memory, mood and
behavior, but the resulting side effects associated with these agents have made
their use limited. The present study was undertaken to assess the potential of Pundi Rasayana (PR) as a memory
enhancer. MEMORHIS is a poly-herbal formulation comprising of the herbal
ingredients and pharmaceutical adjuvants. The plant
extracts used for formulating this preparation were selected since they had
exhibited very promising cognition improving effects in mice. The suspension
was prepared using plant extracts of N. jatamansi,
O. sanctum, A. racemosus, P. nigrum,
M. elengi, P. niruri, G. glabra. Other ingredients of the preparations were
ascorbic acid, cardamom oil, methyl paraben, propyl paraben, propylene glycol
and sodium carboxy methyl cellulose.
The present study was undertaken to assess the potential of an
MEMORHIS as a memory enhancer. Elevated plus maze and passive avoidance
paradigm were employed to evaluate learning and memory parameters. MEMORHIS
(50, 100 and 250 mg/kg, p.o.) was administered for 8
successive days to both young and aged mice. MEMORHIS (100 and 250 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly improved learning and memory in young
mice and also reversed the amnesia induced by diazepam (1 mg/kg, i.p.), and scopolamine (0.4 mg/kg, i.p.).
Furthermore, it also reversed aging induced amnesia due to natural aging of
mice. MEMORHIS profoundly increased whole brain acetyl cholinesterase
inhibition activity. Hence, MEMORHIS might prove to be a useful memory
restorative agent in the treatment of dementia seen in the elderly. The
underlying mechanism of its action may be attributed to its antioxidant and
acetyl cholinesterase inhibition property
KEYWORDS: MEMORHIS;
Amnesia; Learning; Memory.
.
INTRODUCTION:
Alzheimer’s disease is a neurodegenerative disorder associated
with a decline in cognitive abilities and severe behavioral abnormalities such
as irritability, aphasia, apraxia, agnosia and restlessness (Khachaturian, 1985). Alzheimer
patients frequently have non-cognitive symptoms, such as depression, apathy and
psychosis, which impair their day-to-day activities (Jay, 2005; Palmer, 2002).
Enhancement in the life-span of human beings in developed and developing
countries has resulted in proportionate increase in the number of patients
suffering from senile dementia. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is said to be the
leading cause of dementia in elderly individuals (Liu et al., 2012).
AD individuals exhibit deterioration in mental functions rendering
them incapacitated to perform normal daily activities. However, evidence shows
that AD can also afflict young individuals as early as 40 years of age
(Sugimoto et al., 2002). Neuritic plaques (consisting
of a core of β- amyloid aggregates covered by
dead neurons, microglia and apolipoprotein E) and neurofibrillary tangles are the major pathological
hallmarks of an Alzheimer brain (Selkoe, 2001).
Cholinergic drugs such as Donepezil®
improve learning, memory and attention. The non-cognitive aspects of dementia
however are linked to serotonin and dopamine rather than acetylcholine because
these neurotransmitter systems most probably influence mood, emotional balance
and psychosis (Zhang et al., 2004).
There has been a steady rise in the number of patients suffering
from Alzheimer’s disease (AD) all over the world. There are around 30 million
patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease all over the world, out of which
United States of America alone has around 4.5 million patients (Hebert et al.,
2003), despite the severity and high prevalence of this disease. Therefore,
neurobiologists all over the world are looking for new directions and
alternative strategies for managing this disease of senior citizens. In India
AD patents are estimated to be less than 3 million (Shaji,
2005). These prevalence figures however, point out that the number
of patients suffering from AD are considerably small in India when
compared to USA.
Nootropics are a
class of psychotropic agents with selective facilitatory
effect on integrative functions of the central nervous system, particularly on
intellectual performance, learning capability and memory (Plan et al., 1996;
Reddy et al., 1998). Piracetam, the first
representation of a class of nootropic agents, has
been shown to improve memory deficits in geriatric individuals. Repeated
injections of piracetam had improved learning
abilities and memory capacities of laboratory animalss
(Bhattacharya et al., 1993).
Acetylcholine is considered the most important neurotransmitter
involved in the regulation of cognitive functions. Cognitive dysfunction has
been shown to be associated with reduced cholinergic transmission and the
facilitation of central cholinergic transmission with improved memory
(Bhattacharya et al., 1993; Finucane et al.,
2006). Selective loss of cholinergic neurons and decrease in cholinacetyl transferase activity
was reported to be a characteristic feature of senile dementia of the
Alzheimer’s type (Agnolli et al., 1983; Foster, 2006). There are extensive evidences
linking the central cholinergic system to memory (Fodale
et al., 2006; Nordberg, 2006; Ghelardini et al.,
1998; Peng et al., 1997; Olney, 1990).
Anticholinesterases such as Metrifonate (Ringman et al.,
1999), Physostigmine, Tacarine,
Donepezil (Sugimoto et al., 2002), Huperzine-A (Bai et al., 2000), Rivastigmine (Potkin et al.,
2001), Galanthamine (Sramek
et al., 2000) and Eptastigmine (Braida
et al., 2000) have all been shown to reverse amnesia produced by disruption of
cholinergic system. Enzyme choline acetyltransferase is involved in the synthesis of
acetylcholine and acetylcholinesterase is involved in
the degradation of acetylcholine. In the present study,
Plant extracts of Zingiber officinale (Joshi et al., 2006), Nardostachys
jatamansi (Joshi et al., 2006a), Foeniculum vulgare (Joshi et
al., 2006b), Hibiscus sabdariffa (Joshi et
al., 2006), Ocimum sanctum (Joshi et al.,
2006), and Desmodium gangeticum
(Joshi et al., 2006), Piper nigrum (Joshi
et al., 2006), Glycyrrhiza glabara (Parle
et al.,2003, 2004) have been found to posses nootropic
effects and they had significantly lowered the whole brain AChE
activity thereby elevating acetylcholine levels in the brain.
MEMORHIS is a poly-herbal formulation comprising of the herbal
ingredients and pharmaceutical adjuvants. The plant
extracts used for formulating this preparation were selected since they had
exhibited very promising cognition improving effects in mice. This suspension
was prepared in our research laboratory using plant extracts of N. jatamansi, O. sanctum, A. racemosus,
P. nigrum, M. elengi, P. niruri, G. glabra. Other
ingredients of the preparations were ascorbic acid, cardamom oil, methyl paraben, propyl paraben, propylene glycol, sodium carboxy
methyl cellulose and purified water.
METHODS:
Preparation of poly-herbal formulation-MEMORHIS
MEMORHIS suspension was prepared using lyophilized extracts of N.
jatamansi, O. sanctum, A. racemosus,
P. nigrum, M. elengi, P. niruri, G. glabra, and other
ingredients were ascorbic acid, cardamom oil, methyl paraben,
propyl paraben, propylene
glycol, sodium carboxy methyl cellulose and purified
water. Each 5 ml of MEMORHIS contained lyophilized extracts of N. jatamansi (20 mg), O. sanctum (20 mg), A. racemosus (20 mg), P. nigrum
(5 mg), M. elengi (20 mg), P. niruri (10 mg), G. glabra
(10 mg), ascorbic acid (5 mg) and cardamom oil (Q.S.).
Acute toxicity studies
Acute toxicity studies were performed according to OECD/OCDE
guidelines (Ecobichon, 1997). Male Swiss mice
selected by random sampling technique were employed in this study. The animals
were fasted for 4 h with free access to water only. All the plant extracts were administered
orally at a dose of 5 mg/kg initially. During the first four hours after the
drug administration, the animals were observed for gross behavioral changes if
any for 7 days. The parameters such as hyperactivity, grooming, convulsions,
sedation, hypothermia and mortality were observed. If mortality was observed in
two out of three animals, then the dose administered was considered as toxic
dose. However, if the mortality was observed in only one animal out of three
animals then the same dose was repeated again to confirm the toxic effect. If no
mortality was observed, then only higher doses of test drugs were employed for
further toxicity studies.
Fig. 1. Effect of MEMORHIS (MEM, 50, 100 and 250 mg/kg) administered
orally for eight successive days on transfer latency of young and aged mice
using elevated plus maze. Piracetam (200 mg/kg, i.p.) was used as a standard drug.
Values are mean ±S.E.M. (n=6* indicates P< 0.01 as compared to
control group of young mice.
a indicates P< 0.001 as
compared to control group of young mice.
b indicates P< 0.01 as
compared to control group of aged mice.
c indicates P< 0.001 as
compared to control group of aged mice.
(One way ANOVA followed by Tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests)
Fig. 2. Effect of MEMORHIS (MEM, 50, 100 and 250 mg/kg, p.o.) on diazepam (Dia, 1 mg/kg, i.p.) and scopolamine (Sco, 0.4
mg/kg, i.p.) induced amnesia in young mice using
elevated plus maze. Piracetam (200 mg/kg, i.p.) was used as a standard drug.
Values are mean ±S.E.M. (n=6).
* indicates P< 0.01 as compared to control group of young mice.
a indicates P< 0.01 as
compared to diazepam (Dia) group alone.
b indicates P< 0.001 as
compared to diazepam (Dia) group alone.
c indicates P< 0.01 as
compared to scopolamine (Sco) group alone.
d indicates P< 0.001 as
compared to scopolamine (Sco) group alone
(One way ANOVA followed by Tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests)
Fig. 3. Effect of
MEMORHIS (MEM, 50, 100 and 250 mg/kg) administered orally for eight successive
days on step down latency of young and aged mice using passive avoidance
apparatus. Piracetam (200 mg/kg, i.p.)
was used as a standard drug.
Values are
mean ±S.E.M. (n=6).
* indicates
P< 0.01 as compared to control group of young mice.
a indicates P< 0.001 as compared to control group of
young mice.
b indicates P< 0.01 as compared to control group of aged
mice.
c indicates P< 0.001 as compared to control group of
aged mice.
(One way
ANOVA followed by Tukey-kramer multiple comparison
tests)
Fig. 4. Effect of
MEMORHIS (MEM, 50, 100 and 250 mg/kg, p.o.) on
diazepam (Dia, 1 mg/kg, i.p.)
and scopolamine (Sco, 0.4 mg/kg, i.p.)
induced amnesia in young mice using passive avoidance apparatus. Piracetam (200 mg/kg, i.p.) was
used as a standard drug.
Values are
mean ±S.E.M. (n=6).
* indicates
P< 0.01 as compared to control group of young mice.
a indicates P< 0.01 as compared to diazepam (Dia) group alone.
b indicates P< 0.001 as compared to diazepam (Dia) group alone.
c indicates P< 0.01 as compared to scopolamine (Sco) group alone.
d indicates P< 0.001 as compared to scopolamine (Sco) group alone
(One way ANOVA followed by Tukey-kramer
multiple comparison tests)
Fig. 5. Effect of MEMORHIS (MEM, 50, 100 and 250 mg/kg,
p.o.) on brain cholinesterase (AChE)
activity of young and aged mice using Ellman’s
colorimetric method. Piracetam (200 mg/kg, i.p.) was used as a standard drug. Phenytoin
((12 mg/kg, p.o.) was used as negative control.
Values are mean ±S.E.M. (n=6).
* indicates P< 0.01 as compared to control group of young mice.
a indicates P< 0.001 as
compared to control group of young mice.
b indicates P< 0.01 as
compared to control group of aged mice.
c indicates P< 0.001 as
compared to control group of aged mice.
(One way ANOVA followed by Tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests)
Laboratory models for testing memory
Elevated plus Maze
The elevated plus maze served as the exteroceptive
behavioral model (wherein the stimulus existed outside the body) to evaluate
learning and memory in mice. The apparatus consisted of two open arms (16 cm x
5 cm) and two covered arms (16 cm x 5 cm x 12 cm). The arms extended from a central platform (5
cm x 5 cm), and maze was elevated to a height of 25 cm from the floor. On the
first day, each mouse was placed at the end of an open arm, facing away from
the central platform. Transfer latency
(TL) was taken as the time taken by the mouse to move into one of the covered
arms with all its four legs. TL was recorded on the first day. If the animals
did not enter into one of the covered arms within 90 sec., it was gently pushed
into one of the two covered arms and the TL was assigned as 90 sec. The mouse
was allowed to explore the maze for additional 10 sec and then returned to its
home cage. Memory retention was examined 24 h after the first day trial i.e. on
the second day (Parle et al., 2004a; Itoh et al.,
1990).
Passive shock avoidance paradigm
Passive avoidance behavior based on negative reinforcement was
used to examine the long-term memory. The apparatus consisted of a box (27 X 27
X 27 cm) having three walls of wood and one wall of Plexiglas, featuring a grid
floor (3 mm stainless steel rods set 8 mm apart), with a wooden platform (10 X
7 X 1.7 cm) in the center of the grid floor. The box was illuminated with a 15
W bulb during the experimental period. Electric shock (20V AC) was delivered to
the grid floor. Training was carried out in two similar sessions. Each mouse
was gently placed on the wooden platform set in the center of the grid floor.
When the mouse stepped down from the wooden platform set in the center of the
grid floor and placed all its paws on the grid floor, shocks wee delivered for
15 sec and the step down latency (SDL) was recorded (Parle et al., 2004). SDL
was defined as the time taken by the mouse to step down from wooden platform to
grid floor with its entire paw on the grid floor. Animalss
showing SDL in the range (2-15 sec) during the first test were used for the
second session and the retention test. The second-session was carried out 90
min after the first test. When the animalss stepped
down before 60 sec, electric shocks were delivered for 15 sec. During the
second test, animalss were removed from shock free
zone, if they did not step down for a period of 60 sec. Retention was tested
after 24 h in a similar manner, except that the electric shocks were not applied
to the grid floor (Parle et al., 2003).
Estimation of brain acetyl cholinesterase (AChE) activity
The animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation carefully to
avoid any injuries to the tissue. The whole brain AChE
activity was measured using the Ellman method (Ellman et al., 1961). This was measured on the basis of the
formation of yellow color due to the reaction of thiocholine
with dithiobisnitrobenzoate ions. The rate of
formation of thiocholine from acetylcholine iodide in
the presence of tissue cholinesterase was measured using a spectrophotometer.
The sample was first treated with 5, 5’-dithionitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) and the
optical density (OD) of the yellow color compound formed during the reaction at
412 nm every minute for a period of three minutes was measured. Protein
estimation was done using Folin’s method. AChE activity was calculated using the following formula:
R= d O.D. X Volume of Assay (3
ml)
E X mg of protein
Where,
R= rate of
enzyme activity in ‘n’ mole of acetylcholine iodide hydrolyzed / min / mg
protein
d O.D.= Change in absorbance / minute
E =
Extinction coefficient = 13600 / M / cm
Statistical analysis
All the results were expressed as mean ± standard error (SEM). The
data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey
Kramer’s test. P values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
RESULTS:
Acute toxicity studies: All the doses (5, 50, 250,
500 and 2000 mg/kg, p.o.) of MEMORHIS (MEM) did not
produce any mortality even with the highest dose (2000 mg/kg, p.o.) employed. Three submaximal
doses (50, 100 and 250 mg/kg, p.o.) were selected for
further psychopharmacological and biochemical studies.
Effect on transfer latency using elevated plus maze: MEMORHIS
(50, 100 and 200 mg/kg, p.o.) showed dose-dependent
reduction in TL of 8th day and 9th day, indicating
remarkable improvement in learning ability and memory of the young and aged
mice as compared to respective control groups (Fig. 1). Diazepam (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and scopolamine (0.4 mg/kg, i.p.)
significantly increased (P < 0.01) the TL of 9th day indicating
impairment in memory (amnesia). MEMORHIS (100 and 250 mg/kg, p.o.) successfully (P< 0.001) reversed the amnesia
induced by both diazepam and scopolamine (Fig. 2).
Effect on step down latency using
passive avoidance paradigm.
MEMORHIS (50, 100 and 250 mg/kg, p.o.)
administered to young and aged mice for consecutive 8 days, showed
dose-dependent increase in SDL values as compared to respective control groups
(Fig. 3). MEMORHIS (50, 100 and 250 mg/kg, p.o.) also
exhibited reversal of amnesia induced by diazepam and scopolamine in young mice
(Fig. 4).
Effect on brain cholinesterase
activity.
MEMORHIS (50, 100 and 250 mg/kg, p.o.)
showed a remarkable reduction in the brain acetyl cholinesterase activity in young
and aged mice, as compared to respective control groups. Whereas, phenytoin (12 mg/kg, p.o.)
significantly (P< 0.01) increased the acetyl cholinesterase activity. Piracetam (200 mg/kg, i.p.) was
the standard nootropic agent employed (Fig. 5).
DISCUSSION:
Memory function is vulnerable to a variety of pathologic processes
including neurodegenerative diseases, strokes, tumors, head trauma, hypoxia,
cardiac surgery, malnutrition, attention deficit disorder, depression, anxiety,
the side effects of medication, and normal ageing (Newman et al., 2001; Mesulam,
2000). As such, memory impairment is commonly seen by physicians in multiple
disciplines including neurology, psychiatry, medicine, and surgery. Memory loss
is often the most disabling feature of many disorders, impairing the normal
daily activities of the patients and profoundly affecting their families.
The ancient Ayurvedic physicians had understood the delicate
cellular mechanisms of the body and the deterioration of the functional
efficiency of the body tissues. These Ayurvedic scientists had thus developed
certain dietary and therapeutic measures to delay the ageing process, while
rejuvenating functional dynamics of the body organs. This revitalization and
rejuvenation is known as the ‘rasayana chikitsa’ (rejuvenation therapy) (Govindarajan
et al., 2005). Rasayana drugs act inside the
human body by modulating the nuero-endocrino-immune systems and have been found to be a rich
source of antioxidants (Brahma et al., 2003). Brahmi
rasayana, Trikatu churna were reported to exhibit significant
decrease in AChE activity in whole brain homogenates
of mice, indicating their anti-cholinesterase potential (Joshi et al., 2006).
They had also reversed diazepam, scopolamine and ageing-induced impairment in learning
and memory in mice (Joshi et al., 2005).
Glycyrrhiza glabra and ascorbic acid were proved to be memory enhancers in
earlier studies (Parle et al., 2004; 2003) from our laboratory. MEMORHIS
successfully reversed scopolamine, diazepam or ageing-induced amnesia, when
administered for successive 8 days. Piracetam, the
established nootropic agent was used in the present
study for comparison because, it improves memory as a net result of several
protective actions such as increased resistance to adverse conditions, brain
protection against physical and chemical injuries and enhancement of reserve
energy stores. Piracetam also increased choline uptake in cholinergic nerve endings, thereby
facilitating cholinergic transmission in brain (Wu et al., 1994; Parson et al.,
1993). Piracetam elevated the density of frontal
cortex acetylcholine receptors by 30-40%, restoring the levels of acetylcholine
in the brain (Balaraman et al., 2002).
MEMORHIS exhibited highly significant anticholinesterase
activity in both and young and aged mice. Thus, it is possible that enhanced
cholinergic transmission resulting from increased acetylcholine synthesis in
brain due to abundant availability of choline and
reduction of brain cholinesterase activity in young and aged mice may explain
the memory improving effect exhibited by MEMORHIS. Hence, MEMORHIS can be of
enormous use in the preliminary management of early symptoms of cognitive
dysfunctions such as Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. Further investigations
using human volunteers are warranted for further confirmation of nootropic potential. The possible
involvement of other neurotransmitters like glutamate, GABA, catecholamines, serotonin etc. in the pathogenesis of
cognitive disorders.
REFERENCES
1. Khachaturian ZS. Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Arch. Neurol. 42;
1985: 1097-1105.
2. Jay ME. Choinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of dementia. J Am Osteopath
Assoc. 3; 2005: 145-158.
3. Palmer AM. Pharmacotherapy for
Alzheimer’s disease: Progress and prospects. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 23; 2002:
426-427.
4. Sugimoto H, Ogura H, Arai Y, Iimura Y,
Yamanishi Y. Research and development of Donepezil hydrochloride, a new type of acetyl
cholinesterase inhibitor. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 89; 2002: 7-20.
5. Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease: genes,
proteins and therapy. Physiol. Rev.
81; 2001: 741-766.
6. Zhang L, Zhou FM, Dani JA. Cholinergic
drugs for Alzheimer’s disease enhance in vitro dopamine release. Mol. pharmacol. 66; 2004: 538-544.
7. Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias
JL, Bennett DA, Evans DA. Alzheimer Disease in the U.S. Population: Prevalence
Estimates Using the 2000 Census. Arch. Neurol. 60; 2003: 1119 – 1122.
8. Shaji S. Prevalence of dementia in an
urban population in Kerala, India. Br. J. Psychiatry. 186; 2005:
136-140.
9. Plan JC, Zhang SS. Antagonism
of Piracetam on the amnestic
effect of diazepam in mice. Yao Xue Xue Bao.
31; 1996: 91-94.
10. Reddy DS, Kulkarni SK. Possible role of
nitric oxide in the nootropic and antiamnestic
effects of neurosteroids on aging and dizoclipine induced learning impairment. Brain Res.
799; 1998: 215-229.
11. Bhattacharya SK, Upadhyay SN, Jaiswal AK. Effect of piracetam
on electroshock-induced amnesia and decrease in acetyl choline
in rats. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 31; 1993: 822-824.
12. Finucane TE, Gilstad JR. Should cholinesterase
inhibitors be used to treat Alzheimer's disease. Nat.
Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2; 2006: 118-119.
13. Agnolli A, Martucci
N, Manna V, Conti L. Effect of cholinergic and anticholinergic
drugs on short term memory in electroencephalographic study. Clin.
Neuropharmacol. 6; 1983: 311-323.
14. Foster TC. Biological markers of age-related memory deficits:
treatment of senescent physiology. CNS Drugs. 20; 2006: 153-166.
15. Fodale V, Quattrone D, Trecroci C, Caminiti V, Santamaria LB.
Alzheimer's disease and anesthesia: implications for the central cholinergic
system. Anesthesia. 97; 2006. 445-452.
16. Nordberg A.
Emerging biology of the cholinergic system across the
spectrum of Alzheimer's disease. Int. Psychogeriatr. 1; 2006: S3-S16.
17. Ghelardini C, Galeotti
N, Barboloni A, Furukawa S. Memory facilitation and
stimulation of endogenous nerve growth factor synthesis by the acetylcholine
releaser PG-9. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 78; 1998:
245-251.
18. Peng WH, Hsich
MT, Wu CR. Effect of long term administration of berberine
of scopolamine induced amnesia in rats. Jpn. J. pharmacol. 74; 1997:
261-265.
19. Olney JW. Excitotoxic amino acids and neuropsychiatric disorders. Annu.
Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 30; 1990: 47-71.
20. Ringman JM, Cummings JL. Metrifonate: update on a new antidementia
agent. J. Clin. Psychiatr. 60; 1999:
776-782.
21. Bai DL, Tang XC, He XC. Huperzine A, a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of
Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Med. Chem. 7; 2000: 355-374.
22. Potkin SG, Anand
R, Fleming K, Alva G, Keator D, Carreon
D, Messing J, Wu JC, Hartman R, Fallon JH. Brain metabolic
and clinical effects of rivastigmine in Alzheimer’s
disease. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol.
4; 2001: 223-230.
23. Sramek JJ, Frackiewicz
EJ, Cutler NR. Review of acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor galanthamine.
Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs. 9; 2000: 2393-2402.
24. Braida D, Ottonella
F, Sala M. Eptastigmine
improves eight arm radial maze performance in aged rates. Pharmacol.
Res. 42; 2000: 299-304.
25. Ecobichon DJ. The
basis of toxicology testing. 1997; CRC Press.
New York.
26. Newman MF, Kirschner JL, Phillips B.
Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function
after coronaryartery bypass surgery. N. Engl. J.
Med. 344; 2001: 395-402.
27. Mesulam MM. Principles of behavioral and
cognitive neurology. 2000; Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Govindarajan
R, Rastogi S, Vijayakumar
M, Shirwaikar A, Rawat AK, Mehrotra S, Pushpangadan P. Studies on the antioxidant activities of Desmodium
gangeticum.
Biol. Pharm. Bull. 26; 2003: 1424-1427.
29. Brahma SK, Debnath PK. Therapeutic
importance of Rasayana drugs with special references
to their multi-dimensional actions. Aryavaidyan. 16; 2003: 160-163.
30. Balaraman R, Shingala
J. Nootropics. Indian J. Pharmacol. 34; 2002: 439-440.
31. Parson SM, Prior C, Marshall IG. Acetylcholine
transport, storage and release. Int. Rev. Neurobiol.
35; 1993: 279-390.
32. Wu D, Hersh LB. Choline
acetyltransferase: celebrating its fiftieth year. J.
Neuro. Chem. 62; 1994: 1653-1663.
33. Liu W, Xu J, Wang H, Xu
C, Ji C, Wang Y, Feng C,
Zhang X, Xu Z, Wu A, Xie Z,
Yue Y. Isoflurane-induced
spatial memory impairment by a mechanism independent of amyloid-beta
levels and tau protein phosphorylation changes in
aged rats. Neurol Res. 34 (1); 2012:
3-10.
34. Hanumanthachar Joshi, Milind Parle. Effects of piperine on memory and behaviour
mediated by monoamine neurotransmitters. J. Trad.
Medicines 22; 2005: 39-43.
35. Hanumanthachar Joshi, Milind Parle. Antiamnesic Effects
of Desmodium gangeticum in Mice. YAKUGAKU
ZASSHI 126(9); 2006: 795-804.
36. Hanumanthachar Joshi, Milind Parle. Brahmi rasayana improves learning and memory in mice. Evidence
Based Complementary and Alternative Medicines 3(1); 2006a: 79-85.
37. Hanumanthachar Joshi, Milind Parle. Nardostachys
jatamansi improves learning and memory in mice. J.
Med. Food. 9 (1); 2006b: 113-118.
38. Hanumanthachar
Joshi, Milind Parle. Zingiber
officinale: Evaluation of its nootropic
effect in mice. Afr J Trad
Comp Alt Med. 3 (1); 2006c: 64-74.
39. Hanumanthachar Joshi, Milind Parle. Nootropic activity of calyces of Hibiscus sabdariffa
Linn. IJPT 5 (1); 2006d:
1-10.
40. Hanumanthachar Joshi, Milind Parle. Cholinergic basis of memory
improving effect of Foeniculum vulgare Linn. J. Med. Food 9 (3); 2006e:
395-399.
41. Hanumanthachar Joshi, Milind Parle. Trikatu
churna- A promising memory enhancer in mice.
Planta Indica
1; 2005: 14-17.
42. Alpesh B Desai, Virendra
G Kagathara, Hanumanthachar
Joshi, Amit T Rangani, Harshad Mungra. Evaluation of Antiamnesic effect of Solasodine in Mice. International
J. PharmTech Res. 3 (2); 2011: 732-740,
Received on 20.01.2012
Modified on02.02.2012
Accepted on 12.02.2012
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry.
4(2): March-April 2012,
97-103